Read the judgment here.
This case concerns the conflicting decisions of the CA: Edgehill v SSHD  EWCA Civ 402 and Haleemudeen v SSHD  EWCA Civ 558 and whether the old or new rules should apply to Article 8 applications made prior to 9 July 2012 and/or following further changes made and in force from 6 September 2012. Held that the SSHD is entitled to apply Appendix FM to decisions following the statement of changes in force from 6 September 2012 regardless of when that decision was made. Decisions made between 9 July and 2012 and 5 September 2012 will fall to be decided under the old rules, as per Edgehill.
A second issue raised considers the two-stage Article 8 approach (§3). In §§60-67 there is an outline of the approach in Izuazu and Nagre, cited with approval and an ‘explanation’ of some passages from Ganesabalen v SSHD  EWHC 2712 (Admin), including the need for there to always be a second stage consideration.
The information and any commentary on the web page 1MCB Legal Updates is provided free of charge for information purposes only and does not amount to legal or other professional advice.
Whilst we try to ensure the information provided in 1MCB Legal Updates is accurate it may have been superseded by other legal developments since the date of publication.
1MCB do not accept any responsibility for any loss which may arise from reliance on information contained in 1MCB Legal Updates.